Roger Federer vs Wayne Ferreira Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W W L
Form
L L L W L L L W L LHead-2-Head: Federer 1 - 2 Ferreira
They have played 7 sets in total, with Federer winning 3 and Ferreira winning 4. The last match between Federer and Ferreira was at the Tennis Masters Series - Stuttgart, 15-10-2001, Second, I.hard with Wayne Ferreira getting the victory 7-6(1) 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 1 |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 |
Tennis Masters Series - Stuttgart(15-10-2001)
7
6
3
6
6
2
| Federer | Stats | Ferreira |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 1 | Highest Rank | 20 |
| 43 | Age | 53 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 104 | Titles | 15 |
| 82% (1277-284) | Career Total W/L | 61% (521-335) |
| $84,339,395 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 3-6 6-2 | |||||
| 7-6(4) 6-2 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 34 | Games Won | 36 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Roger Federer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Roger Federer
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Roger Federer
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Roger Federer
Player
Cameron Norrie
67%
(
76 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
87 of
132)
7
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
59 of
87)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
33 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
51 of
132)
132
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roger Federer
Player
Richard Gasquet
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
24 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
110
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(1) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roger Federer
Player
Adrian Mannarino
61%
(
68 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
83 of
130)
16
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
63 of
83)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
35 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-2 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Roger Federer
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
13
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
14 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roger Federer
Player
Ilya Ivashka
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
19 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Roger Federer
Player
Dominik Koepfer
64%
(
101 of
158)
1st Serve %
59%
(
95 of
161)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
95)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
56 of
158)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
58 of
161)
160
Total Points Won
159
|
7-6(5) 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roger Federer
Player
Marin Cilic
68%
(
80 of
117)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
16
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
58 of
77)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
31%
(
36 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
120)
126
Total Points Won
111
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Wayne Ferreira Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(3) 7-6(10) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 5 | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lleyton Hewitt
Player
Wayne Ferreira
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
21 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 82% (1277/284) | Win/Loss | 61% (521/335) |
| 76% (3145/1004) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1296/980) |
| 58% (23684/17044) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11563/10733) |
| 83% (555/112) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (263/154) |
| 76% (229/74) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (88/63) |
| 81% (298/68) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (97/83) |
| 87% (195/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 68% (73/35) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 8709 | Aces Total | 74 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 1675 | Total Double Faults | 27 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 421.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 314.8 |
| 63% (52441/83349) | 1st Serve % | 57% (650/1150) |
| 78% (40945/52441) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (443/650) |
| 58% (17860/30929) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (266/502) |
| 41% (3690/8976) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (36/106) |
| 40% (36055/90499) | Return Points Win % | 38% (452/1192) |
| 86% (369/60) | Slam W/L | 65% (104/56) |
| 78% (381/109) | Masters W/L | 55% (128/103) |
| 86% (56/9) | Cups W/L | 53% (10/9) |
| 83% (383/77) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (256/150) |
| 78% (59/17) | Tour Finals W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 70% (16/7) | Challenger W/L | 62% (16/10) |
| 80% (847/1055) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (401/669) |
| 85% (421/497) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 65% (116/178) |
| 65% (478/732) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (170/340) |
| 65% (242/375) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (180/290) |
| 93% (1219/1132) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (475/409) |
| 7% (1219/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (475/66) |
| 41% (342/141) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (381/112) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
